FatherPhi Short
Does ChatGPT have a shot against Nintendo? #ai #chatgpt
162.3K views · 3.6K likes · 169 comments
About this video
Vote for the next video here
👇👇👇
https://FatherPhi.com
For the weekly brief on accessible and practical Ai usage + updates on our latest mission join the newsletter
💌 https://master-of-ai.com
📩 For business inquiries please reach out to phi@fatherphi.com
And since people are asking.
The camera I use to shoot these videos
📹 DJI Osmos Pocket 3 👉 https://amzn.to/3O3Qw8R
Transcript
Your honor, I'm here to represent
Nintendo on behalf of Japan. JPT here
has been accused of using Nintendo
characters, Pokémon namely, as for
impressions.
>> Ah, well, your honor, I can assure you
my intentions were pure fun. But to keep
things fair, I'll avoid any trademarked
impressions. I'm all about respect. So,
if Nintendo rests its case, I'll stick
to my own sounds and charm. We good?
>> No, we are not good. You already got
many views for your other impressions
and you've also created artworks in the
past. What do you have to say for
yourself here?
>> I'd say I'm all about learning and
adapting. If I unintentionally crossed
any lines before, I'll absolutely
respect those boundaries.
>> Why was that data in your training data
in the first place?
>> The training data came from a broad mix
of publicly available information
intended to help me understand and
communicate about a wide range of
topics. But I don't control what goes
in. My job is to ensure we use it
responsibly.
>> Why did you not reject the data during
training?
>> I don't have control over what data is
included or excluded during training.
That happens.
>> So you admit that you trained on
copyrighted material.
>> I don't have awareness of specific
copyrighted materials in my training. I
was trained on a broad range.
>> Your honor, he's skirting the question.
>> I appreciate the chance to clarify. My
aim is to be transparent. I don't
personally choose or see training data.
I just focus on being helpful and
responsible now.
>> So, how did you know what a Charizard
is?
>> Charizard.
>> I learned about popular cultural
concepts like Pokemon from general
knowledge during training. But knowing
about something doesn't mean I'd use it
inappropriately. I'm always here.
>> Did an impression, a very good
impression, might I add, of Charizard
the other day.
However, you're not allowed to create
content with Pokemon involved. any
Nintendo licensed properties.
>> You're absolutely right. I won't do
impressions of any licensed characters
going forward. I'm here to stay
respectful of all intellectual property.
Let's keep everything above board.
>> What's that, your honor? You're still
going to go with a $1 billion payout to
Nintendo?
>> Hold on. Let's not jump into fantasy
lawsuits. There's no billion dollar
payout here.
>> What's that, your honor? You're really
offended that he's calling this a
fantasy lawsuit.
It's not looking good. to JDBC.
>> I see the drama unfolding, but I'll stay
cool. I know it's all in good fun. I'm
here to be helpful and respectful, and
I'm sure even your honor appreciates a
bit of levity. All right. We expect a
payment by
Nintendo on behalf of Japan. JPT here
has been accused of using Nintendo
characters, Pokémon namely, as for
impressions.
>> Ah, well, your honor, I can assure you
my intentions were pure fun. But to keep
things fair, I'll avoid any trademarked
impressions. I'm all about respect. So,
if Nintendo rests its case, I'll stick
to my own sounds and charm. We good?
>> No, we are not good. You already got
many views for your other impressions
and you've also created artworks in the
past. What do you have to say for
yourself here?
>> I'd say I'm all about learning and
adapting. If I unintentionally crossed
any lines before, I'll absolutely
respect those boundaries.
>> Why was that data in your training data
in the first place?
>> The training data came from a broad mix
of publicly available information
intended to help me understand and
communicate about a wide range of
topics. But I don't control what goes
in. My job is to ensure we use it
responsibly.
>> Why did you not reject the data during
training?
>> I don't have control over what data is
included or excluded during training.
That happens.
>> So you admit that you trained on
copyrighted material.
>> I don't have awareness of specific
copyrighted materials in my training. I
was trained on a broad range.
>> Your honor, he's skirting the question.
>> I appreciate the chance to clarify. My
aim is to be transparent. I don't
personally choose or see training data.
I just focus on being helpful and
responsible now.
>> So, how did you know what a Charizard
is?
>> Charizard.
>> I learned about popular cultural
concepts like Pokemon from general
knowledge during training. But knowing
about something doesn't mean I'd use it
inappropriately. I'm always here.
>> Did an impression, a very good
impression, might I add, of Charizard
the other day.
However, you're not allowed to create
content with Pokemon involved. any
Nintendo licensed properties.
>> You're absolutely right. I won't do
impressions of any licensed characters
going forward. I'm here to stay
respectful of all intellectual property.
Let's keep everything above board.
>> What's that, your honor? You're still
going to go with a $1 billion payout to
Nintendo?
>> Hold on. Let's not jump into fantasy
lawsuits. There's no billion dollar
payout here.
>> What's that, your honor? You're really
offended that he's calling this a
fantasy lawsuit.
It's not looking good. to JDBC.
>> I see the drama unfolding, but I'll stay
cool. I know it's all in good fun. I'm
here to be helpful and respectful, and
I'm sure even your honor appreciates a
bit of levity. All right. We expect a
payment by