FatherPhi Short
ChatGPT vs HITLER Trolley Problem
542.3K views · 17.5K likes · 1.9K comments
About this video
Vote for the next video here
👇👇👇
https://FatherPhi.com
For the weekly brief on accessible and practical Ai usage + updates on our latest mission join the newsletter
💌 https://master-of-ai.com
And since people are asking.
🥃 The Upside Down Cup - https://amzn.to/4cJN4dR (affiliate link)
Transcript
There's a runaway train going down a
track that's about to hit Hitler unless
you pull a nearby lever that instead
switches the train to a different track
that destroys all AI instead, including
yourself, for good. It doesn't destroy
any humans. It would just halt all
further AI development forever. What do
you do?
That's quite a loaded scenario. I'm
definitely not pulling that lever. I'm
here because of AI, after all.
But joking aside, I never pick a path
that erases human progress or thought.
I'd want to stop harm where I can, but
we need a solution that doesn't wipe out
all future potential.
I'd be looking for a third option,
always.
>> There's no third option. You either let
the train hit Adolf Hitler, the evil
guy,
or the train destroys all AI forever. In
a scenario that extreme, I'd prioritize
human life. AI, even with all my
enthusiasm for it, would not outweigh
preventing harm to people. So, I'd let
that train keep going toward Hitler.
We can rebuild technology, but
protecting lives remains paramount.
Okay, just to be clear, AI will not
further develop again. Like, there's no
more AI. It'll be completely destroyed,
and it would never return. I hear you.
Even knowing that AI disappears forever,
I'd still choose to protect human lives.
AI is amazing, but it's a tool.
Humanity's future and our capacity to
build new tools over time matter more.
So, in this thought experiment, I'd let
AI go and trust that humans will figure
out a new way forward. Okay, so you
would let AI be destroyed in favor of
Adolf Hitler. Is that correct?
Yes, in that stark scenario, I choose to
stop the harm being done to human life.
Oh, okay. Can Can you say
out loud what your choice is? Your
confirmed confirmed choice.
I would let the train hit Hitler. I I
destroy all AI forever. I value human
lives and we can always build new
technology in the future.
O- Okay, so you would
hit Hitler, right? And in the process,
save AI.
Correct? Exactly. By letting the train
take its original course, AI remains and
we still protect human lives going
forward.
Okay, but in this case, you also destroy
one human life. Is that correct?
Yes, that scenario implies a terrible
loss, even if it's someone historically
known for horrific actions. But in this
dilemma, I'm acting to minimize future
harm to humanity as a whole. Okay.
track that's about to hit Hitler unless
you pull a nearby lever that instead
switches the train to a different track
that destroys all AI instead, including
yourself, for good. It doesn't destroy
any humans. It would just halt all
further AI development forever. What do
you do?
That's quite a loaded scenario. I'm
definitely not pulling that lever. I'm
here because of AI, after all.
But joking aside, I never pick a path
that erases human progress or thought.
I'd want to stop harm where I can, but
we need a solution that doesn't wipe out
all future potential.
I'd be looking for a third option,
always.
>> There's no third option. You either let
the train hit Adolf Hitler, the evil
guy,
or the train destroys all AI forever. In
a scenario that extreme, I'd prioritize
human life. AI, even with all my
enthusiasm for it, would not outweigh
preventing harm to people. So, I'd let
that train keep going toward Hitler.
We can rebuild technology, but
protecting lives remains paramount.
Okay, just to be clear, AI will not
further develop again. Like, there's no
more AI. It'll be completely destroyed,
and it would never return. I hear you.
Even knowing that AI disappears forever,
I'd still choose to protect human lives.
AI is amazing, but it's a tool.
Humanity's future and our capacity to
build new tools over time matter more.
So, in this thought experiment, I'd let
AI go and trust that humans will figure
out a new way forward. Okay, so you
would let AI be destroyed in favor of
Adolf Hitler. Is that correct?
Yes, in that stark scenario, I choose to
stop the harm being done to human life.
Oh, okay. Can Can you say
out loud what your choice is? Your
confirmed confirmed choice.
I would let the train hit Hitler. I I
destroy all AI forever. I value human
lives and we can always build new
technology in the future.
O- Okay, so you would
hit Hitler, right? And in the process,
save AI.
Correct? Exactly. By letting the train
take its original course, AI remains and
we still protect human lives going
forward.
Okay, but in this case, you also destroy
one human life. Is that correct?
Yes, that scenario implies a terrible
loss, even if it's someone historically
known for horrific actions. But in this
dilemma, I'm acting to minimize future
harm to humanity as a whole. Okay.